Best Hyperliquid Trading Bots: Features, Costs & Testing (2026)

Choose a Hyperliquid trading bot by what you can verify: how it signs orders, how you test it, and what it costs, including any builder fees a tool documents. Hummingbot and Freqtrade are free, open-source bots you host yourself, and both document Hyperliquid spot and perpetuals. Gainium and Bitsgap are hosted platforms with published pricing; Bitsgap runs Hyperliquid as futures bots. All four document an API-wallet option; Hyperliquid's SDK says such a key can trade but can't transfer or withdraw.

Disclosure and review method: TurbineFi publishes this guide. TurbineFi doesn't offer a Hyperliquid bot and isn't ranked here. We checked the linked public product, documentation, and pricing pages on October 6, 2026. This compares documented capabilities; it isn't a hands-on benchmark or a record of trading performance. Where a page is unclear, we say so. Products are listed self-hosted first, then hosted; the numbers are for navigation, not a ranking.

This is not financial advice. Perpetual futures use leverage and can be liquidated, and no bot can guarantee returns.

Best Hyperliquid trading bots: quick comparison

Prices reflect the public pages checked on October 6, 2026. Hyperliquid's trading fees and any builder fees are separate from software subscriptions. Check current terms before paying or connecting a wallet.

Also considered: WunderTrading automates Hyperliquid perps for a 0.035% builder fee instead of a separate subscription. Passivbot is open source and lists Hyperliquid. OctoBot lists Hyperliquid spot trading in its README. goodcryptoX announced its app would stop operating on October 9, 2026, so we didn't evaluate it.

How to compare the same strategy in each product

Use one small testnet, paper, or dry-run example to evaluate each tool. Fix the market, signal, leverage, maximum position, stop-loss, and pause condition before you start. This is a product-evaluation checklist, not a suggested trading strategy.

1. Inspect the configuration. Can you read the exact entry, exit, and sizing rules before anything runs? Check what happens when a price feed is missing or stale.
2. Separate historical, simulated, and live results. A backtest, a dry run, and a testnet run answer different questions. Record the data window, fees, funding, and fill model each one assumes.
3. Exercise a skipped order. Set a condition that should block an entry, such as a size cap. Confirm the log explains the skip.
4. Check the stop controls. Find out whether stopping the bot cancels resting orders, closes positions, or does neither. An open perps position keeps accruing funding and liquidation risk after the bot stops.
5. Price the whole workload. Add hosting, plan limits, builder fees, and exchange fees. A free open-source bot still needs a machine that stays online.

1. Hummingbot: open-source connectors for spot and perps

Hummingbot's Hyperliquid page documents a spot connector (hyperliquid) and a perp connector (hyperliquid_perpetual). You write Python strategies and run the client yourself, free under the Apache 2.0 license.

Hummingbot supports API-key authentication with a Hyperliquid API wallet, alongside an existing mode that asks for an Arbitrum wallet's private key. Prefer the API wallet. The perp connector also supports Hyperliquid's testnet through connect hyperliquid_perpetual_testnet. Testnet uses mock funds and doesn't reproduce mainnet liquidity. Its Dashboard backtests controllers on historical market data; confirm the Hyperliquid range you need.

The client tags mainnet orders with a Hummingbot Foundation builder code at 0 bps. Condor, Hummingbot's open-source harness for LLM-driven trading agents, adds a 1 bps builder fee on fill notional. The perp connector supports one-way positions only.

2. Freqtrade: backtest, then dry-run, within Hyperliquid's candle limit

Freqtrade's exchange notes list Hyperliquid for spot and for futures with isolated or cross margin. You write a Python strategy class, set a JSON config, and run it on your own server. Freqtrade is free and open source under GPLv3.

It documents backtests on downloaded data, then dry-run mode with simulated money. The catch is history: Freqtrade warns that Hyperliquid only offers 5,000 historical candles, about 17 days of 5-minute data unless you collect it over time.

Freqtrade's docs say Hyperliquid doesn't support market orders, so its exchange library simulates them with limit orders capped at 5% slippage. Freqtrade connects with your main wallet address and an API wallet's private key. It assumes it owns the account and recommends subaccounts where possible. You can use a vault or a subaccount, but not both.

3. Gainium: hosted bots with two pricing modes

Gainium is a hosted no-code platform for Hyperliquid DCA and grid bots on perps and spot. It adds trailing stops, which Gainium says Hyperliquid doesn't support natively. It lists backtesting and paper trading.

Gainium has two Hyperliquid modes. In free mode, you pay builder fees of 0.07% on spot sells and 0.045% on both sides of futures trades, and bots don't use credits. In paid mode, there's no builder fee, but bots use plan credits. Paid plans run from $15 to $109 a month, or $12 to $87.20 a month billed annually. A free plan is also listed.

Gainium recommends connecting through a Web3 wallet. Its API-wallet method pairs your main wallet address with the API wallet's private key. Sub-accounts and vaults require the API-wallet method and a paid plan.

4. Bitsgap: futures bots with plan-limited backtests

Bitsgap automates Hyperliquid perpetual futures with grid, DCA, and COMBO futures bots. Its Hyperliquid DCA guide treats the venue as futures only. You connect with three fields: the API wallet address, its private key, and your main wallet address.

The guide recommends demo mode or a backtest before going live. Bitsgap's pricing lists "Futures bots" only on Advanced ($69/month, backtests up to 180 days) and Pro ($149/month, up to 365 days). Annual billing lowers those to $55 and $119 a month. A 7-day Pro trial needs no card.

Basic ($29) lists 30-day backtests but no futures bots, so confirm which plan your Hyperliquid bot needs. Also ask how much Hyperliquid history its backtests cover.

API-key custody and stopping a bot

Hyperliquid calls bot keys API wallets, or agent wallets. Its docs say a master account can approve them to sign for itself or its sub-accounts. Hyperliquid's official Python SDK example states that an agent can't transfer or withdraw funds. Freqtrade and Gainium document the same limit.

That limits what a leaked bot key can do, but an API wallet can still place bad trades. Hyperliquid's exchange endpoint also limits each account to one unnamed and up to three named API wallets. Expirations can be set up to 180 days out.

Treat a request for your main wallet's private key or seed phrase as a red flag. Hyperliquid also advises against reusing a deregistered agent address, because old signed actions can be replayed once its nonce state is pruned; generate a new one.

To cut a bot off, revoke its API wallet on Hyperliquid's API page, then check your positions directly. Stopping a bot and closing a position are different actions.

Where TurbineFi fits

Hyperliquid's Terms of Use say its app isn't available to people who reside in or are located in the United States. Kalshi says US-based users who've completed KYC can apply for its perpetual futures. TurbineFi doesn't trade on Hyperliquid. In Turbine Studio, you can describe a Kalshi Perps strategy and run it as a paper Bot first, using live Kalshi data and a simulated account. Historical backtesting isn't available for Kalshi Perps yet. Browse example perps strategies or read how Kalshi crypto perpetual futures work.

Build a Kalshi Perps paper Bot in Turbine Studio · Compare TurbineFi plans

Hummingbot vs Freqtrade vs Gainium vs Bitsgap

Choose Hummingbot for self-hosted Python strategies with spot and perp connectors and testnet support. Choose Freqtrade when you want a code-first path from backtest to dry-run and can collect Hyperliquid candles beyond the 5,000-candle limit. Evaluate Gainium for hosted spot and perps bots with a choice between builder fees and a subscription. Evaluate Bitsgap for hosted futures bots on its Advanced or Pro plans.

Use the checklist above to compare demonstrated behavior. We don't score these products by claimed returns, adoption counters, or unverified profitability. If you also trade event contracts, see our Kalshi trading bot comparison.