Prediction market bot comparison

TurbineFi vs Ratio

TurbineFi and Ratio take different approaches to prediction-market automation. TurbineFi helps traders build and test their own rules before deployment. Ratio is a social mobile app for following traders, sharing positions, and automatically copying Polymarket wallets with configurable sizing and safety limits.

Fact-checked against public product pages on July 22, 2026. Pricing and features can change.

Try TurbineFi See the comparison

Short answer

Choose TurbineFi to research and automate an original strategy. Choose Ratio for a mobile social feed and configurable Polymarket copy trading.

TurbineFi vs Ratio: quick comparison

Publicly documented capabilities as of July 22, 2026.

Category	TurbineFi	Ratio
Best for	Custom strategies that move from supported historical testing to monitored deployment	Social discovery and mobile Polymarket copy trading
Core workflow	Describe a strategy, inspect the logic, backtest where supported, then deploy	Find or paste a wallet, select a copy mode and limits, then activate
Venues	Kalshi and supported Polymarket workflows	Polymarket
Testing	Historical backtesting with fills, fees, drawdown, and logs where supported	No historical strategy backtesting documented
Published pricing	$19 Starter, $99 Basic, or $199 Pro per month	Docs mention a 2.5% buy fee; no subscription price is published
Main tradeoff	Historical coverage varies, and plans meter deployments	Invite-only beta and dependent on the future behavior and fills of copied wallets

What to know before choosing

The meaningful differences are in testing, platform scope, cost, and runtime control.

Original strategy automation versus social copy trading

TurbineFi starts with the trader's own thesis. It turns that idea into explicit logic, provides supported historical testing, and lets the trader deploy and monitor the resulting bot.

Ratio starts with people and wallets. Users can follow friends, browse traders, paste any public Polymarket wallet, and copy it through Portfolio Mirror, Fixed Amount, or Percentage sizing. Slippage, position, and bankroll limits can constrain future copied orders.

Research and testing

TurbineFi places supported historical backtesting between strategy creation and live deployment. Traders can review modeled fills, fees, drawdown, and trade logs, while recognizing that coverage varies and a simulation cannot predict future performance.

Ratio does not document historical strategy replay or paper trading. Its safety limits can reduce exposure, but they cannot establish that a wallet's prior performance will continue or that the copier will receive the same price.

Pricing, access, and custody

Ratio's copy-trading FAQ mentions a 2.5% buy fee when calculating available balance, but the docs do not present a complete public pricing table or subscription price. TurbineFi publishes monthly plans at $19, $99, and $199.

Ratio is currently described as an invite-code beta with iOS and Android apps. It supports card, Apple Pay, and crypto funding routes. Users should verify minimum deposits, accepted token and network combinations, current fees, and Polymarket eligibility in the app.

Which platform fits you?

Start with the workflow you need, then verify it with your actual strategy.

Choose TurbineFi when

You want to automate your own rules.
You want supported historical backtests.
You need Kalshi and Polymarket workflows.
You want inspectable bot logic and deployment monitoring.

Build a strategy

Choose Ratio when

You want a mobile social prediction-market app.
You want to copy any public Polymarket wallet.
You value proportional, fixed, or percentage copy modes.
You want slippage and bankroll limits on copied trades.

Frequently asked questions

Is TurbineFi better than Ratio?

TurbineFi is a better fit for original strategy design and supported historical backtesting. Ratio is a better fit for mobile social discovery and configurable Polymarket copy trading.

Does Ratio offer historical backtesting?

Ratio does not document historical backtesting for user-defined strategies. Its public docs focus on live copy trading with sizing, slippage, position, and bankroll controls. Past wallet performance does not predict copied results.

How much does Ratio cost compared with TurbineFi?

Ratio's public copy-trading FAQ mentions a 2.5% buy fee but does not show a complete pricing table. TurbineFi publishes monthly plans at $19, $99, and $199. Confirm Ratio's current fee screen before trading.

Can TurbineFi or Ratio guarantee profitable trades?

No. Automation, copy trading, alerts, and historical tests can support a process, but none can guarantee returns. Fees, spread, liquidity, latency, fills, market resolution, and weak strategy logic can all cause losses.

Sources and methodology

We compared public first-party product and pricing pages. We did not test every feature or audit either platform's infrastructure. Vendor claims are treated as claims, and missing public detail is described as unknown rather than assumed.

This comparison is not financial advice. Prediction-market trading can lose money, and no bot can guarantee returns.

Test the workflow yourself

Start with a real strategy.

Describe the rule, inspect the logic, and see whether the available historical data can challenge it.

Open Turbine Studio